Back to issue
Cover of: Die Haftung des Verkäufers für Rechtsmängel gemäß Artt. 41, 42 CISG
Axel Metzger

Die Haftung des Verkäufers für Rechtsmängel gemäß Artt. 41, 42 CISG

[Warranties against Third Party Claims under Arts. 41, 42 CISG Die Haftung des Verkäufers für Rechtsmängel gemäß Artt. 41, 42 CISG]
Section: Aufsätze
Volume 73 (2009) / Issue 4, pp. 842-865 (24)
Published 09.07.2018
DOI 10.1628/003372509789566596
  • article PDF
  • Open Access
    CC BY 4.0
  • 10.1628/003372509789566596
Summary
Warranties against Third Party Claims under Arts. 41, 42 CISG. The United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) provides two regimes for warranties against third party claims. The general rule of Art. 41 establishes a strict liability rule for all third party claims not covered by Art. 42. Article 42 limits the seller's liability for infringement claims based on intellectual property. A seller under the CISG warrants only against third party intellectual property claims he »knew or could not have been unaware« at the time of the conclusion of the contract. In addition, his liability is territorially restricted to claims based on third party intellectual property rights in the countries contemplated by the parties at the conclusion of the contract. This article provides an overview of seller's warranties under Arts. 41 and 42. It examines, more specifically, whether the limited scope of seller's warranties for third party intellectual property claims is efficient and whether it is expedient from a comparative law perspective. Under a traditional economic analysis of law approach, the party who can avoid third party claims most cheaply should bear the risk of infringement claims. This will often be the seller, especially if he has produced the goods or has specific knowledge of the industry. But it may also occur that the buyer is in the superior position to investigate intellectual property rights, e.g. if the buyer is a specialized player in the industry and the seller is a mere vendor without specific knowledge in the field. Article 42 allows an efficient allocation of the risk by the court. The party charged with the risk, be it seller or buyer, should not only warrant against third party rights he knew but also for those he could have been aware of after investigation in the patent and trademark offices of the relevant countries or through other resources. Such a duty to investigate may also exist with regard to unregistered rights like copyrights. A strict interpretation of the seller's (or buyer's) duty is in accordance with international standards. Seller's warranties are strict liabilities rules in many countries with an exception in case of bad faith on the part of the buyer.