Religion in the Roman Empire (RRE)

Katell Berthelot (Aix-en-Provence) is research professor for religious studies in Aix-en-Provence, France.

Jan Dochhorn (Durham) is Associate Professor for New Testament Studies in Durham, GB.

Maren Niehoff (Jerusalem) is Professor in the Dept. of Jewish Thought at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel.

Rubina Raja (Aarhus) is professor of classical archaeology at Aarhus University, Denmark and director of the Danish National Research Foundation’s centre of excellence Centre for Urban Network Evolutions, Aarhus, Denmark.

Jörg Rüpke (Erfurt) is Fellow in Religious Studies at the Max Weber Center for Advanced Cultural and Social Studies at the University of Erfurt.

Christopher Smith (St Andrews), currently seconded to UKRI as Executive Chair of the Arts and Humanities Research Council, St. Andrews, GB.

Chiara Ombretta Tommasi (Pisa) is associate professor of History of Religions at the University of Pisa.

Markus Vinzent (London) is Professor of the History of Theology at King’s College London, UK.

Annette Weissenrieder (Halle-Wittenberg) is Professor for New Testament Exegesis and Theology at the University of  Halle-Wittenberg, Germany.

Associate Editors:

Nicole Belayche (Paris) is Directeur d'études (Professor) at the Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes, Paris, France.

Robyn Le Blanc (Greensboro, NC) is assistant professor for Roman provincial archaeology at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro, North Carolina, USA.

John Curran (Belfast) is Senior Lecturer at the School of History, Anthropology, Philosophy and Politics, Queen´s University, Belfast, UK.

Richard Gordon (Erfurt) is Honorary Professor for the Study of Ancient Religion and Guest Fellow at the Max Weber Center for Advanced Cultural and Social Studies at the University of Erfurt, Germany.

Gesine Manuwald (London) is Professor of Latin at University College London, UK.
Volker Menze (Budapest) is Associate Professor of Late Antique History at Central European University, Budapest, Hungary.

Volker Menze (Budapest) is professor of medieval studies at the Central European University, Budapest, Hungary.

Blossom Stefaniw (Oslo) is Professor of the Intellectual History of Christianity at MF Norwegian School of Theology, Religion and Society, Oslo, Norway.

Miguel John Versluys (Leiden) is professor of classical and mediterranean archaeology at the Leiden University, Netherlands.

Greg Woolf (Los Angeles) is Ronald J Mellor Professor of Ancient History at the Department of Classics at UCLA.

Religion in the Roman Empire (RRE) intends to take a new perspective on the religious history of Mediterranean antiquity, starting from the individual, spontaneous, short-lived or organised groups, and "lived" religion instead of simply presupposing the existence of neatly separated organised "cults" and "religions" and a too early "parting of the ways" between such groups. By taking the modern notion of "lived religion" as one of its starting points, research is invoked that analyses religious data and interprets those as experien­ces, practices addressed to, and conceptions of the divine, which are initiated, appropriated, expressed and shared by individuals in diverse social spaces which may or may not have had an impact on or even have contributed to transform institutional frames.

Within a spatial continuum from the primary space of individuals in family, domestic spaces of everyday production to the shared space of public institutions and trans-local literary communication, the journal intends to open and link different research fields, presenting new or reviewing well-known complexes of evidence in different parts and different periods of the ancient to the late antique world, concentrating on the Roman imperial period without excluding earlier developments in the Western and Eastern parts of the ancient Mediterranean and the adjacent areas. "Roman Empire" is meant as a focus, rather than a criterion for exclusion.

Religious traditions existed and influenced individual and group behaviour, but they were upheld and reworked in the constant interaction of individuals with the agents of traditions and providers of ritual services, "priests", "holy men" or professionals in the various fields. Such traditions formed a relevant part of the environment of religious action, but they should not be studied as isolated or even independent variables. Social, political and economic as well as cul­tu­ral and inter-religious contexts of micro- and macro-religious phe­no­mena need particular attention. Thus, we opt for the singular "religion" rather than speaking of a plural of "religions", which presupposes boundaries rather than looking for the character and the agents of boundary work.

Religion in the Roman Empire is audacious in the sense that it intends to further and document new and integrative perspectives on religion in the Ancient World and to explore adequate multidisciplinary methodologies. Basically, perspectives like "lived ancient religion" set out to replace the concepts of "cults" and "religions" as integrative frameworks in the description of a field that could usefully be conceptualised as "religion". Thus, it takes up recent, but still incipient, research to modify and cross disciplinary boundaries (e.g. History of Religion, Archaeology, Anthropology, Ancient History, Classics, Jewish Studies) and specialist subfields (e.g., New Testament, Early Christianity, Rabbinic Studies, Patristic Studies, Coptic Studies, Gnostic and Manichean Studies, Oriental Languages). We hope to stimulate the development of new approaches that can encompass the local and global trajectories of the multi-dimensional pluralistic religions of antiquity.

From such starting points the journal focuses on everyday experience and those practices, expressions, and interactions that could be related to "religion". In this context "religion" is understood as a spectrum of experiences, actions, beliefs and communications hinging on human communication with super-human or even transcendent agent(s), including but not limited to "gods" and "God", "demons", "angels" and "heroes". Ritualization and elaborate forms of representation are called upon for the success of communication with these addressees. By refocusing on the individual and the situational – that is, on the intrinsic determinants of lived religion – it aims to bring the study of ancient Eurasian religion in discussion with global History of Religion as much as with more specialized research on particular regions, epochs, traditions or bodies of texts.

When concentrating on practices, relevant evidence is not limited to texts preserving autobiographical experiences and expressions. Most of the evidence at our disposal is best interpreted neither as "authentic" individual expression nor as institutional "survival", but as media, rhetoric and representation – as cultural work created in interaction. Scattered evidence needs to be contextualised and interpreted by relating it to individual agents, their use of space and time, their forming of social coalitions, their negotiation with religious specialists or "providers" and their attempts to "make sense" of religion in a situational manner and thus render it effective. In terms of the ma­te­ri­al and disciplinary competences involved, the journal welcomes texts reconstructed on the basis of a long manuscript tradition, epigraphic evidence and archaeological remains from material vestiges of rituals, small-scale votives and instruments, up to architectural complexes as well as meta-data created by serialisation or statistical analysis. Thus, historical, literary, archaeological and comparative studies are welcome, as long as they offer innovative and convincing steps towards the proposed reconfiguration of our knowledge of the areas noted above.

Within the field of archaeology there has been strong focus on the material culture of religion for a number of years. The methodological and theoretical directions which such research has taken have been manifold attesting to the fact that archaeological material and contexts (or the lack of it) is complicated to work with and may offer different perspectives on religion and religious practice. Through the focus of this journal on lived religion it is the intention to bring a further perspective to archaeological research within the field of religion and ritual and other devotional practices. We want to stimulate debate and discussions about how archaeology and archaeo­logical research may add and question the ways in which religious experiences and life are approached in current and former scholarship. This focus may include both reviewing past contributions in the light of new material and presenting new archaeological material to give new insights into religion in the ancient world or enlighten new ways of seeing old material.

Research on ancient Judaism has long been pursued in relative isolation from the study of the Roman imperial contexts that shaped so much of ancient Jewish history and literature. Just as Classicists have tended to presume their isolation to dismiss Jews as an atypical provincial Roman population, so scholars of Jewish history and literature tended to presume their isolationism from the surrounding local and imperial cultures, particularly when studying Rabbinic and other materials written in Hebrew. The Roman Empire looms large in Jewish history as an agent for the catastrophic changes in the wake of the failures of the revolts of the first and second centuries CE. Until recently, however, little was done to try to understand the Roman contexts of Judaism, then or thereafter.

Multiple lines of specialist research have begun to show the value of more integrative approaches – whether by re-reading Josephus in relation to Roman historiography, by considering late antique Rabbis as provincial subelites, by culling Hekhalot literature for echoes of colonial mimicry and resistance, by looking to documentary and inscriptional data to reconsider ancient Jewish identities, or by revisiting synagogue art and architecture in relation to the broader cultural trends concurrent with the empire’s Christianization. Given the range of Jewish literature composed under Roman rule – spanning not just the writings of Philo and Josephus but also some Dead Sea Scrolls and so-called "pseudepigrapha" as well as early Rabbinic literature, piyyutim, and perhaps also some Hekhalot materials – there may be much to be gained from experimenting with a re-orientation that reads other sources from similarly integrative perspectives, or indeed asking how Jews and Judaism may have participated in the very making of "religion" in the Roman Empire. At the very least, attention to the Roman imperial context of much of ancient Jewish life and literature may help to facilitate fresh approaches to ancient Jewish history, bridging pre-70 and post-70 periods but also integrating material culture and different Jewish literary corpora created under Roman rule.

Ancient Judaism thus provides an opportunity for enrichingly reci­procal study of Religion in the Roman Empire. On the one hand, Judaism was a pre-Roman ethnic practice transformed into a naturalized part of the Roman landscape. On the other hand we are unusually well-informed about the paradoxical impact on Roman rule on the Jews' "great tradition" – the center annihilated, the practice which made Judaism most at home in the mediterranean religious environment, animal sacrifice, ended. On the other hand, we witness concurrently the massive elaboration of an ostensibly traditional but in fact largely novel system of religious law and thought by a new clerisy. Despite its novelty, there is little that is decisively 'Roman' about rabbinic law and literature: Roman rule thus generated a religious system whose complexity and strangeness is barely adumbrated in the archaeological record. Consequently, Judaism may serve among other things to remind us how little we know about other forms of Roman imperial religious expressions and practices.

In the field of New Testament exegesis there was in the last decades a double paradigm shift which immediately put the topics of Religion in the Roman Empire into the focus of attention: On the one hand, the diachronic orientation which dominated the scholarly exegesis for almost a century was more and more complemented and partly even replaced by a synchronic one which led to renewed interest in  the cultural and religious context. On the other hand, the predominant concentration on (mostly Palestinian) Judaism as the "root" or "native soil" of Early Christianity was complemented by a new awareness of the importance of Hellenistic culture in all its aspects already for Palestinian Judaism and therefore also for the emerging Christian movement from its very beginning. Topics to be discussed in such an interdisciplinary cooperation include "Religion and Ethics", "Prayer", "Cult (and its transformation and spiritualization)", "God(s)", "Mediators", "Power and Religion", "Paideia and Piety" (focusing on philosophers, orators, Rabbis, teachers as new religious authorities) and "Food and Religion". Even from within the exegetical discipline the field has considerably broadened and Religion in the Roman Empire is instrumental in that.

The study of early Christianity so far has often focussed on Patristic apostolic and apologetic literature that has been preserved and promoted by a Christianity that had become the state religion of the Roman Empire in late antiquity, hence, it often suffers from a methodological circularity, namely its anachronistically presupposed canonical sources and, based on them, its methodological framework, hardly recognizing that both were only the result of what they take as ontological outset. While the framework identifies Christianity with the political, language, cultural and institutional units it is operating in – conceptualized as Roman, Western or Eastern Christianity etc. – it provides religious identity provisions, collective identities and Christian life structures (baptism, the eucharist and the weekly and annual rites) which need to be questioned rather than taken for granted.

Therefore Religion in the Roman Empire welcomes studies of early Christian materials in the broader context of the religiously pluralistic ancient Roman world. All aspects of early Christianity may be considered, including New Testament, apocryphal, or patristic literature; archaeological or papyrological materials; and area studies such as Syriac or Coptic Christianity. Topics could include investigations that engage Christian materials in discussions of wider thematic or material issues, such as lived religion, religion and violence, space and place, ritual, sex/gender studies, women’s studies, masculinity studies, social grouping, group styles, boundary setting strategies (such as "orthodoxy and heresy"), scriptural practices, the new materialism, religious mediation, agency, and the new philology, among others. A goal is to encourage analysis that crosses or resets disciplinary borders and invites engagement with scholarship that will place work on lived ancient religion within wider contemporary discussions in the fields of religion, social science, and the humanities broadly conceived.

The scope of the journal aims to bring together scholars working in different fields and with different types of sources in thematic issues in order to propose and discuss methodological approaches, material evidence or social and historiographic models interpreting religious "data" within a framework, which is no longer defined by the clear-cut container concepts of "cults", ethnic or "polis religions", or the orthodox and heretical groups figuring in traditional accounts of the ancient history of religion.

The journal will concentrate on original research articles, but we also invite review articles covering a wider field of recent research or intensively engaging with new stimulating monographs. Thematic issues will bring together specialized articles, but occasional open issues invite also submissions of articles to the editors. Articles will undergo double blind peer review.

Please send manuscripts, editorial inquiries and book review proposals to:

Prof. Dr. Jörg Rüpke
Max-Weber-Kolleg
Universität Erfurt
Postfach 900 221
99105 Erfurt
E-mail: rre@uni-erfurt.de

Authors are invited to use all types of letters and languages relevant for their area in quotations and are asked to provide translations. For speci­fic terms within the running texts, however, transcribed forms will be used (with the exception of Greek).

Religion in the Roman Empire instructions to authors

Acceptance for publication is subject to the condition that the article contains original unpublished work and has not been submitted for publication elsewhere.

Exclusive copyright to articles is granted to Mohr Siebeck when they are accepted for publication in our journals and edited volumes. Mohr Siebeck has the exclusive right to reproduce and distribute the contribution as well as to make it publicly accessible online. As author you retain the right to distribute the e-offprint of your contribution for private use (e.g. via e-mail), but not to make it accessible to the public - e.g. at any website, intranet or repository.

For articles in journals, exclusivity falls away one year following publication, for chapters in edited volumes after two years. Correspondingly, you may then (a) reproduce and distribute a print version of your contribution; (b) grant another publisher non-exclusive permission to reprint an article following its publication with us; (c) make the print identical version accessible online for non-commercial purposes only. In all cases, full reference is to be made to the original Mohr Siebeck publication and, for journal contributions where applicable, mention made of the article's DOI (Digital Object Identifier).

Further information on this and the rights retained by the author can be learned at rights@mohrsiebeck.com.

Please do not send any unsolicited review copies. The publisher and the editors reserve the right to keep unsolicited books.

You can obtain a subscription to Religion in the Roman Empire (RRE) from your bookstore, your subscription agent or directly from the publisher. Please send new orders and cancellations as well as all questions regarding subscription to the journals to our Customer Service Department, Mohr Siebeck GmbH & Co. KG, Postfach 2040, D-72010 Tübingen, fax them to +49 7071 51104 or e-mail to journals@mohrsiebeck.com. Subscriptions may be cancelled four weeks before the end of the year at the latest. One volume contains three issues, each of approximately 140 pages in length. Prices do not include shipping and handling. The price for a single issue is  79.00 €.

Price information

Volume 10 (2024)

• Institutions  199.00 € * (including IP controlled electronic access for one location (single-site: one site = one city) of a medium-sized institution (up to 40 000 users). If your institution is larger than 40 000 users (FTE), or has several locations, please contact the publisher to receive an offer. Contact:
  simon-nanko@mohrsiebeck.com)
• Individuals  54.00 €* (including electronic access with the user's name and password)

* Subscribe-to-Open (S2O): The journal is Open Access and relies on new library subscription procurement processes. More information on www.mohrsiebeck.com/elektronische-publikationen or https://subscribetoopencommunity.org

https://subscribetoopencommunity.org

Optional cloth binding
Cloth binding for an additional  29.00 €

Postage
Within Germany  9.50 €
Within Germany plus cover  12.10 €
All other countries  17.00 €
All other countries plus cover  19.60 €

Current and previous volumes
You can order the current and certain previous volumes directly from the publisher (subject to availability). Please call +49 7071 923-20, e-mail: journals@mohrsiebeck.com. The price of the current issues applies to orders for back issues as well.

Online access to the full text of the RRE for subscribers

The articles in the RRE are available online to institutions and private persons, starting with volume 1 (2015). Online access can be obtained through our eLibrary.

Advertising agency

Tilman Gaebler
Postfach 113
72403 Bisingen
Deutschland
Telephone: +49 7476 3405
Fax: +49 7476 3406
E-mail: tilman.gaebler@t-online.de

The Religion in the Roman Empire advertising rates