Theology

Adam Winn

The Purpose of Mark's Gospel

An Early Christian Response to Roman Imperial Propaganda

[Die Absicht des Markusevangeliums. Eine frühchristliche Antwort auf römisch-kaiserzeitliche Propaganda.]

74,00 €
including VAT
sewn paper
ISBN 978-3-16-149635-6
available
Also Available As:
Published in English.
Adam Winn argues that the Gospel of Mark was written in response to propaganda of the Roman Empire – propaganda that infringed upon the faith committs that early Christians held about Jesus of Nazareth.
In this book, Adam Winn addresses the long debated question of the purpose of Mark's gospel. After placing the composition of Mark in Rome at a time shortly after the destruction of the Jerusalem Temple, he seeks to reconstruct the historical situation facing both the Markan evangelist and his community. This reconstruction focuses on the rise of the new Roman Emperor Vespasian and the aftermath of the Jewish Revolt in Rome. A significant feature of this reconstruction is the propaganda used to gain and secure Vespasian's power-propaganda that included oracles and portents, divine healings, and grand triumphs. Of particular interest is the propagandistic claim that Vespasian was the true fulfillment of Jewish messianic prophecies. Winn argues that such a claim would have created a christological crisis for the fledgling church in Rome-a crisis that called for a compelling Christian response. Winn seeks to demonstrate that Mark's gospel could be read as just such a response. He demonstrates how the major features of Mark's gospel-his incipit, Christology, teaching on discipleship, and eschatology-can be read as a counter résumé to the impressive résumé of Vespasian. In the end, this project concludes that Mark was composed for the purpose of countering Roman imperial propaganda that had created a crisis for its author and community.
Authors/Editors

Adam Winn Born 1976; 2007 PhD in New Testament Studies from Fuller Theological Seminary; since 2005 teaching courses in Biblical Studies at Fuller Seminary and Azusa Pacific University.

Reviews

The following reviews are known:

In: Review of Biblical Literature — http://www.bookreviews.org/pdf/7376_8037.pdf (06/2010) (Warren Carter)
In: thechurchofjesuschrist.us — www.thechurchofjesuschrist.us (06.05.2010) (Joel L. Watts)
In: Bibliotheca Sacra — 169 (2012), pp. 499–501 (Joseph D. Fantin)
In: Catholic Biblical Quarterly — 72 (2010), S. 846–847 (Karl A. Kuhn)
In: New Testament Abstracts — 53 (2009), S. 175
In: Evangelical Quarterly — 81 (2009), S. 276–277 (John Proctor)
In: Studien zum NT und seiner Umwelt — 34 (2009), S. 248–249 (A. Fuchs)
In: Biblische Zeitschrift — 54 (2010), S. 133–135 (Markus Lau)
In: Journal for the Study of the New Testament (JSNT) — 31.5 (2009), S. 60 (Michael Tait)
In: Theological Book Review — 21 (2009), S. 46–47 (David Lincicum)