Das Rechtsverhältnis im Internationalen Privatrecht bei Savigny - 10.1628/003372517X14976085322393 - Mohr Siebeck

Stefan Reuter

Das Rechtsverhältnis im Internationalen Privatrecht bei Savigny

21,70 € including VAT
article PDF
In the legal system conceptualised by Savigny, legal relationships serve as the starting point. Savigny defines a legal relationship as a relation between two people or between one person and an object as determined by legal rules. Accordingly, a legal relationship always has two elements: a material element (the specific facts in question) and a formal element (the legal rules). For example, where the facts of a concrete case involving two people match the conditions of the contract law rules, a legal relation exists between these two people. As compared to a legal relationship, a legal institution consists only of formal elements, namely legal rules, having the same subject matter. For example, all legal provisions regarding marriage form the legal institution of marriage. Although Savigny uses legal relationships as the starting point in both substantive law as well as in private international law, he creates different categories of legal relationships for each of them. Whereas in substantive law Savigny distinguishes between four categories (law of property, law of obligations, family law and law of succession) he adds a fifth category for the sake of private international law: legal capacity. In substantive law, Savigny defines legal capacity not as a legal relationship but only as a pre-condition of a legal relationship. This seems logical given that legal capacity cannot be described as a relation either between two people or between one person and an object, with such a relation being an essential condition according to Savigny's definition of a legal relationship. Nevertheless, in private international law it is generally accepted that legal capacity needs its own, separate conflict rule. Legal capacity was therefore one of the subjects of private international law, and for this reason Savigny re-categorised it as a legal relationship for the purpose of conflict of laws. Ultimately, no advantages follow from having legal relationships serve as the starting point in private international law – as opposed to legal institutions or legal rules. Legal relationships do not result in a greater number of connections nor in a de-politicization of private international law. Rather, difficulties result when attempting to classify legal relations unknown to the lex fori.

Stefan Reuter Geboren 1985; Studium der Rechtswissenschaft in Tübingen, Aix-en-Provence und London; Stipendiat des Evangelischen Studienwerks e.V. Villigst; 2009 Maîtrise en Droit (Aix-Marseille III); 2012 Erste Juristische Prüfung (Tübingen); 2014 LL.M. (Westminster School of Law); 2015 Promotion; seit 2015 Referendariat am Landgericht Tübingen.