Theology

Joseph S. Park

Conceptions of Afterlife in Jewish Inscriptions

With Special Reference to Pauline Literature

[Vorstellungen vom Leben nach dem Tode in jüdischen Inschriften. Unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der paulinischen Literatur. Von Joseph S. Park.]

unrevised e-book edition 2019; Original edition 2000; 2000. XI, 227 pages.

Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2. Reihe 121

69,00 €
including VAT
eBook PDF
ISBN 978-3-16-157214-2
available
Also Available As:
Published in English.
Joseph S. Park examines the ancient Jewish inscriptions as they pertain to afterlife beliefs and compares them with afterlife expectations in Pauline literature.
Joseph S. Park examines the various indications of belief in or denial of afterlife in the Jewish funerary inscriptions found throughout the Mediterranean world, mostly during the Hellenistic and Roman periods. He reveals a wide variety of conceptions of and attitudes toward death and afterlife. Besides such well-known ideas as resurrection and the peaceful state of the deceased prior to it, there also seem to be indications of a denial of meaningful afterlife, often associated with a generally Sadducean alignment on the part of the deceased.
These findings are then compared with corresponding indications in the Pauline epistles. The comparison shows, after taking into account the basic difference in purpose between the two types of evidence, a substantial agreement, and moreover seems to shed light on some aspects of the interpretation of Paul. For example, the indications of a denial of afterlife in the inscriptions points to the possibility of a similar background for those who are said in 1 Corinthians 15 to deny the resurrection. In addition to providing new insights in both areas in reference to afterlife beliefs, this comparison also sheds some light on the larger methodological issues affecting both bodies of evidence.
In addition to specific implications such as this, Joseph S. Park demonstrates that both the Jewish inscriptions and Paul are best interpreted in reference to a background of ideas which is neither strictly Jewish nor pagan, but the result of free interaction between the two. This conclusion has obvious implications for the wider questions of Judaism and hellenization.
Authors/Editors

Joseph S. Park Born 1969; 1993 M.A. Fuller Theological Seminary; 1998 Ph.D. University of Cambridge/GB; since 1998 Ordination and ministry in Los Angeles, California, and part-time graduate teaching.

Reviews

The following reviews are known:

In: Nederlands Theologisch Tijdschrift — Jg.55 (2001) Nr.2, S. 159f. (P.W.v.d.Horst)
In: Journal of Theological Studies — Jg.53 (2002), H.1, S. 261ff (David Noy)
In: Journal of Jewish Studies — Vol. 54 (2003), H.1, S. 158f (Margaret H. Williams)
In: The Southern Baptist Journal of — Vol.6 (2002), H.4, S. 110f (Steven M. Ortiz)
In: New Testament Abstracts — Jg.45 (2001), Nr.1, S. 207
In: Salesianum — Jg.64 (2002), H.1, S. 152f (R. Vincent)
In: Theologische Literaturzeitung — Jg.128 (2003), H.2, Sp.153ff (Karl-Wilhelm Niebuhr)
In: Theologische Rundschau — 82 (2017), S. 195–223 (Michael Tilly)