Philosophy
Heideggers »Schwarze Hefte« im Kontext
Geschichte, Politik, Ideologie
Hrsg. v. David Espinet, Günter Figal, Tobias Keiling u. Nikola Mirković
[Contextualizing Heidegger's »Black Notebooks«. History, Politics, Ideology.]
2018. X, 243 pages.
Also Available As:
Published in German.
The publication of the so-called »Black Notebooks« attracted special attention not just from within the field of philosophy, but also from beyond its specialized discourse. The texts contained in the notebooks, entitled »Observations« and »Reflections«, divulge anti-Semitic resentments of a previously unknown poignancy and far-reaching repercussions for the evaluation of Heidegger's political position. This volume is a collection of new studies which were presented at an international congress held in January this year at the Freiburg Institute for Advanced Studies (FRIAS). The critical reading of the texts is connected with comprehensive questions on the interpretation and assessment of Heidegger's philosophy. The volume's contributions thus offer a sound philosophical contextualization and evaluation of Heidegger's notebooks.Survey of contents
Günter Figal: Figuren der Radikalität – Gérard Bensussan: Heidegger entre antisémitisme, philosophie et pensée – Dieter Thomä: Wie antisemitisch ist Heidegger? Die »Schwarzen Hefte« im philosophischen Kontext – Nikola Mirković: Der Stil der »Schwarzen Hefte« – Sacha Golob: The Occlusion of Ethics: Heidegger as Theoretician – Morten Thaning: Dezisionismus, Durchbruch und anderer Anfang: Die »Schwarzen Hefte« und Thomas Manns Dr. Faustus – Denis McManus: Heidegger, Historicity and Authenticity – David Espinet: Warum liest Heidegger Kant? Außen- und Innenansichten ab 1931 – Hans Ruin: Im Geiste von Paulus. Das hebräische Erbe denken (Heidegger, Bultmann, Jonas) – Ryan Coyne: Eschatology and the Black Notebooks – Maurizio Ferraris: Can anti-semitism be metaphysical? – Tobias Keiling: »Übermacht des Seyns«. Heidegger und das Trauma der Seinsfrage – Markus Gabriel: Was heißt »denken«? Heidegger 1930–39 und das Problem der Philosophie