
- download Table of Contents & Reading Sample
- picture_as_pdf
- print Print
- share
- send_to_mobile
Simon Ruben Loheide
Quidam putant
Anonyme Ansichten im Werk des Ulpius Marcellus. Funktion und Stellung von Kontroversenberichten im klassischen römischen Recht
[Quidam putant. Anonymous Opinions in the Work of Ulpius Marcellus. The Function and Purpose of Controversies in Classic Roman Legal Texts.]
2025. XV, 393 pages. Published in German.
Summary
Authors/Editors
Reviews
Summary
Why is it that Ancient Roman jurists reported legal controversies? Do these controversies represent real debates, or could they be a rhetoric device used for legal interpretations? Simon Ruben Loheide's study aims to find an answer by developing a novel methodology for assessing the authenticity of controversies and applying it to the works of the Roman jurist Ulpius Marcellus.