Law

Horst Eidenmüller / Florian Faust / Hans Christoph Grigoleit / Nils Jansen / Gerhard Wagner / Reinhard Zimmermann

Revision des Verbraucher-acquis

[Revision of the Acquis Communautaire.]

2011. XVI, 326 pages.
94,00 €
including VAT
sewn paper
ISBN 978-3-16-150902-5
available
Published in German.
When the European Commission initiated the Common Frame of Reference process, it aimed, in particular, at a revision of the acquis communautaire in the field of consumer contract law. However, such a revision has not, to date, been undertaken. The authors of the present paper have attempted to remedy this deficiency by an investigation of the key issues involved: the proper scope and effectiveness of mandatory law, the policing of not individually negotiated unfair contract terms, rights of withdrawal, the unwinding of consumer contracts following the exercise of a right of withdrawal, information duties.
When the European Commission initiated the Common Frame of Reference process, it aimed, in particular, at a revision of the acquis communautaire in the field of consumer contract law. However, such a revision has not, to date, been undertaken. The Draft Common Frame of Reference is marked by a largely uncritical attitude vis-à-vis the acquis. The same will be true, it must be feared, for the 'optional instrument' to be developed by an 'expert group' on that basis by mid-2011. The proposal for a 'horizontal' Directive on Consumer Rights submitted by the Commission in October 2008 also did not benefit from a critical revision of the acquis. The authors of the present paper have attempted to remedy this deficiency by an investigation of the key issues involved: the proper scope and effectiveness of mandatory law, the policing of not individually negotiated unfair contract terms, rights of withdrawal, the unwinding of consumer contracts following the exercise of a right of withdrawal, information duties. This paper presents the main conclusions of a more comprehensive German study in English and in the form of 52 propositions, grouped by subject matter and elucidated, in most cases, by brief comments. We thus hope to initiate a discussion on the reform of European consumer contract law going beyond a harmonizing generalization of individual rules, which emphasizes intellectual coherence as well as consistency of concepts, policies, and evaluations. A particular focus is on rational justifications for consumer contract rules and on how such rules should be formulated in order to serve the economic purposes they are intended to serve.
Authors/Editors

Horst Eidenmüller Born 1963; Statutory Professor for Commercial Law at the University of Oxford and a Professorial Fellow of St. Hugh's College, Oxford.

Florian Faust ist Inhaber des Lehrstuhls für Bürgerliches Recht, Handels- und Wirtschaftsrecht und Rechtsvergleichung an der Bucerius Law School, Hamburg.

Hans Christoph Grigoleit ist Inhaber des Lehrstuhls für Bürgerliches Recht, Handels- und Gesellschaftsrecht, Privatrechtstheorie und Direktor des Munich Center for Capital Markets Law (MuCCML) der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München.

Nils Jansen ist Inhaber des Lehrstuhls für Römisches Recht und Privatrechtsgeschichte sowie Deutsches und Europäisches Privatrecht an der Universität Münster.

Gerhard Wagner Born 1962; holds the Chair for Private Law, Business Law and Law and Economics at Humboldt University of Berlin.

Reinhard Zimmermann ist Direktor am Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht und Professor an der Bucerius Law School, Hamburg.
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0348-7929

Reviews

The following reviews are known:

In: Zeitschrift f. Europäisches Privatrecht — 2013, 917–919 (Ewoud Hondius)
In: Nederlands Burgerlijk Recht — 2011, 536–537
In: Journal of Consumer Policy — 2014, 148