Generational Accounting versus Computable General Equilibrium - 10.1628/0015221022905894 - Mohr Siebeck

Volker Börstinghaus, Georg Hirte

Generational Accounting versus Computable General Equilibrium

Section: Articles
FinanzArchiv (FA)

Volume 58 () / Issue 3, pp. 227-243 (17)

17,00 € including VAT
article PDF
Generational Accounting is only a shortcut to a general equilibrium analysis because it is assumed that individual decisions are unaffected by policy reforms. Nonetheless only two studies examine the accuracy of Generational Accounting, but Fehr and Kotlikoff (1996) consider changes in individual decisions and current tax adaptations to balance the Budget. Thus their approach is inappropriate as a means to compare both methods as they are used in reality. Raffelhüschen and Risa (1997) use a very simple model and simulate very stylized policy changes. So we need to carry out a new examination. Our examples are the recent fiscal reforms in Germany which encompass an income tax reform and a pension reform. The findings are that Generational Accounting is a bad shortcut for the incidence of the income tax reform, but gives a good impression of the quality and sign of the incidence for all but the younger cohorts in the case of the pension reform, and that the Fehr and Kotlikoff approach is misleading.

Volker Börstinghaus No current data available.

Georg Hirte Born 1960; 1981–88 studied economics and theology at the University of Regensburg; 1989–2001 assistant lecturer at the University of Hohenheim and the Catholic University of Eichstätt; 1995 Dissertation, 2000 Habilitation.