Back to issue
Cover of: Minimum Wage Incidence: The Case for Germany
Ronnie Schöb, Andreas Knabe

Minimum Wage Incidence: The Case for Germany

Section: Articles
Volume 65 (2009) / Issue 4, pp. 403-441 (39)
Published 09.07.2018
DOI 10.1628/001522109X486598
  • article PDF
  • available
  • 10.1628/001522109X486598
Due to a system change, access problems and other issues may occur. We are working with urgency on a solution. We apologise for any inconvenience.
This paper analyzes the impact of a statutory minimum wage on employment, wage inequality, public expenditures, and aggregate income in the low-wage sector for two scenarios: a competitive labor market and a monopsonistic labor market. Using data from the 2006 wave of the German Socio-Economic Panel (GSOEP), we show that irrespective of which scenario adequately describes the labor market, a statutory minimum wage reduces employment and raises public expenditures. While aggregate income in the low-wage sector increases, poor households (i.e., those eligible for Unemployment Benefits II), do not benefit from a minimum wage. Wage subsidies at the same fiscal cost ensure more favorable employment effects in both scenarios. However, the workers' income depends on whether we have a competitive or a monopsonistic labor market. A wage subsidy ensures higher household income in a competitive labor market but leads to lower income gains in the monopsonistic scenario. Furthermore, wage subsidies lead to a more equal income distribution than statutory minimum wages, irrespective of their incidence. Combining a minimum wage with a compensating wage subsidy, similar to the French minimum wage system, is extremely costly while still inferior to pure wage subsidies.