Der Sinn für die Möglichkeit des Guten

Hope had been a marginalized classic – for a long time, at least, since things have changed. There is now a vibrant discussion on hope's grammar and status among analytic philosophers; and there are tentative accounts on the theological side to approach hope anew. Both discourses are still largely separated from each other. This overview aims at changing that by presenting the manifold conceptual analyses for 'hope', in discussing hope as virtue, emotion, mood, and attitude, as well as by introducing approaches in regard to gaining and losing hope, individually and collectively. The first part was published in Theologische Rundschau 4/2022. It is followed by this second one dedicated to recent theological literature, mostly monographs. These publications will be reviewed separately as well as, in part, in relation to one another. This article concludes by contemplating where we are standing in contemporary discussions right now and what this might imply for work to come.

AGNES BIDMON, Denkmodelle der Hoffnung in Philosophie und Literatur. Eine typologische Annäherung (Hermaea. Band 140). Berlin/New York: de Gruyter 2016, 440 S. – CHESHIRECALHOUN, Doing Valuable Time. The Present, the Future, and Meaningful Living. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2018, 185 S. – CHRISTOPHE CHALAMET, A Most Excellent Way. An Essay on Faith, Hope, and Love. Lanham/New York: Lexington Books/Fortress Academic 2020, 198 S. – INGOLF ULRICHDALFERTH, Hoffnung (Grundthemen Philosophie). Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter 2016, 228 S. – TERRY EAGLETON, Hoffnungsvoll, aber nicht optimistisch. Berlin: Uhlstein 2016, 256 S. -DAVID ELLIOT,Hope and Christian Ethics.New York: Cambridge University Press 2017, 276 S. – WERNER GÜNTER JEANROND, Reasons to Hope. London/New York: Bloomsbury 2020, 240 S. – ANTHONY KELLY, Eschatology and Hope (Theology in a Global Perspective). Maryknoll (NY): Orbis Books 2006, 192 S. – JONATHAN LEAR, Radikale Hoffnung. Ethik im Angesicht kultureller Z