Die Verbannungdes Dion von Prusa und das Exil des Johannes von Patmos - 10.1628/ec-2019-0012 - Mohr Siebeck

Hans-Josef Klauck

Die Verbannungdes Dion von Prusa und das Exil des Johannes von Patmos

Ein Vergleich

Rubrik: Articles
Early Christianity (EC)

Jahrgang 10 () / Heft 2, S. 157-183 (27)
Publiziert 04.07.2019

18,90 € inkl. gesetzl. MwSt.
Artikel PDF
Dion of Prusa (aka Dio Chrysostom) and John of Patmos (Rev 1:9) seem an unusual choice for a comparison. But both have, at least according to traditional view, one important moment in common: They were both exiled under the emperor Domitian and returned after his death. First a close reading of Rev 1:9 is given, summarizing the main points in the history of reception and modern exegesis. Then questions around Dion'sexile and »conversion« are discussed. Special consideration is given to his Or.13, and its difficult opening paragraph is analyzed in more detail. Then an alternative theory is offered: Both authors were not really exiled by Roman authorities, but went into some kind of voluntary exile. Both saw themselves confronted with execution, and therefore, to put it bluntly, they opted for a flight.

Hans-Josef Klauck Geboren 1946; Studium der Philosophie, Theologie und Bibelwissenschaften in Münster, Bonn und München; 1977 Promotion; 1980 Habilitation; 1981–2001 Professor an den Universitäten Bonn, Würzburg und München; seit 2001 Professor in Chicago; seit 2006 Naomi Shenstone Donnelly Professor of New Testament and Early Christian Literature an der Divinity School der University of Chicago/USA, 2008 Dr. h.c. der Theologischen Fakultät Zürich.