Ingo Klitzsch

Neologie versus (Re-)Union

Johann Salomo Semlers kommentierte Ausgabe der Cusanusschrift De pace fidei

Jahrgang 118 () / Heft 1, S. 57-91 (35)
Publiziert 29.03.2021

35,00 € inkl. gesetzl. MwSt.
Artikel PDF
In 1787 the famous Enlightenment theologian Johann Salomo Semler (1725–1791) published a German translation of De pace fidei, which was originally written by Nicholas of Cusa (1401–1464), one of the first German proponents of Renaissance humanism and an important figure in the Roman Church at the time. Reacting to the fall of Constantinople in 1453, Nicholas outlined a vision of eternal religious peace prompted by an imagined meeting in heaven of seventeen representatives of nations and different religious communities. On the one hand this »una religio in rituum varietate« is based on an epistemological scepticism concerning human knowledge of God, on the other it is founded substantially on a clear Christian or, more specifically, Roman-Catholic, perspective. Despite knowing the works of Nicholas very well, Semler did not take a historical-critical approach to De pace fidei by commenting on the text in the preface and his annotations, but instead used the work to set out his own position in the debates on inter-confessional unity. Indeed, Semler drew on his own theological patterns in such a fundamental and nuanced way that Nicholas's vision of eternal religious peace is changed into a neological summation against (re)union.

Ingo Klitzsch Geboren 1976; Studium der Evangelischen Theologie in Neuendettelsau, Jerusalem (Dormition Abbey), Heidelberg, Jena, Erlangen; Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter am Lehrstuhl für Kirchengeschichte an der Universität Jena; 2008 Promotion; Lehrauftrag für Bayerische Kirchengeschichte an derAugustana-Hochschule Neuendettelsau; seit 2011 Wissenschaftlicher Assistent am Lehrstuhl für Kirchen- und Dogmengeschichte an der Augustana-Hochschule Neuendettelsau; 2019 Habilitation an der Universität Tübingen; seit 2019 Privatdozent.